98% accuracy

Recently played a very nice game I feel very proud of. Only 25 moves, and some of them were easy to find, but I really love when your analysis show you played perfectly!!
And ending with a very cool checkmate sequence.

What are your thoughts about the game? :)

The game was played like there was a fire. What a waste of time controls.

Thorini (2130) +6
Quote: 33.33% (6)
Avg Opponent: 2015.66
Best Win: 2063

darlingteen007 (2185) −6
Quote: 51.84% (706)
Avg Opponent: 2068.88
Best Win: 2337

Just compare the ratings and see the differences. One of the players is playing at their peak performance all the time. The average player is nominally 100's of ratings lower than the best wins. Go figure that one out. I cannot explain it. Maybe there are not enough games from where the stats create these average opponent ratings.

wow, i like the discovered attack with Nd7+

@Toscani :

I don't understand at all what you are saying. And from where you are getting those statistics? When I checked the statistics of both players, your values doesn't match at all.
Even the most logical values, best Win for Thorini can't be 2063? The user I just won here was 2185.

Also, why you say waste of time controls? I really don't understand a single sentence in your comment.

There are browser extension that show the information I gave. It seems to use the rapid time controls to display that info.
chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lichess-custom-stats/ppolcdjceepccgcemodacgafjcoaemlh
As for the time they used: Go to computer analysis and press the tab move time. See the graph for your self and hover the mouse over the line. It took seconds to race through the game. The game had 3 minutes each and they both only used not even a minute each. The time left on the clock was 2:06 and 2:12.

So the game was not a Rapid, nor a Blitz, but a bullet game, even if it should have been a Blitz game, it's not to me. The players treated the game like it was a bullet game. A bit faster it would have been treated like an ultrabullet game. If it was a clock race, than that's all it was and nothing more. White dominated the game. Analyse it using lucas chess gui to get a better picture of the elo graphs of each opponent and the values of each move.

[WhiteAccuracy "91.36"]
[BlackAccuracy "67.88"]
[TotalAccuracy "79.86"]

1.e4 b6 ? 2.d4 Bb7 3.Bd3 Nf6 4.Nd2 e6 5.Ne2 a6 ?! 6.O-O d5 ? 7.e5 Nfd7 8.Nf3 ?!
Be7 9.c3 O-O ? 10.Be3 c5 11.Rc1 c4 ?! 12.Bb1 Nc6 13.Qc2 g6 14.Bh6 Re8 15.Nf4 Bf8
16.Bxf8 Rxf8 ?! 17.h4 Kg7 18.h5 Ne7 ?! 19.hxg6 hxg6 20.Nh5+ Kh8 21.g4 Ng8 ?!
22.Kg2 f6 ? 23.Qxg6 Qe7 24.Rh1 Rf7 25.Ng7+ 1-0

Black was obviously not playing at the same performance level as white. This is why it's nothing special getting 98% on lichess. The less performing an opponent is, the more the other player shines.

98% is just one side of the coin. Black's first move was obviously done to face a challenge. That made it easy for white to gain the center.

Interesting points but I don't agree it is a bullet game.
Blitz 3+0, at 25th move, if both players has spended 1 minute of their clocks, seems a good time management.
Considernig than average games last around 50 moves, it means you literally have 2 minutes for those 50 movements, with 1 extra minute to spare in case you need to think extra in some situations.

Black did not play poorly, according to Lichess analysis, 3 inaccuracies and 1 blunder, with 89% accuracy. However, I understand your point, good analysis with lucas chess gui, I did not know about that one.

Omg very Interesting, need to Put it into My Mind Datra Base